TCW Steel City Senior Lending BDC is a privately offered, perpetual-life business development company that lends to US middle-market companies through senior secured loans. It is the BDC of the PNC–TCW private credit platform: TCW is the Advisor and a PNC subsidiary the Sub-Advisor. Its investors had committed $576.0M at Jun 30, 2026, of which 48.4% was funded, and it had $279.5M of net assets. It borrows under two facilities with separate collateral: a $200.0M subscription line from Natixis, secured on investors' unfunded commitments, and a $475.0M asset-based facility from a Barings-led group, secured on the loan portfolio. At Jun 30, 2026 the subscription line had $105.2M drawn and $15.0M available, because availability is capped by a borrowing base built from eligible investors' unfunded commitments. TCW has asked Natixis to raise the line to $250.0M, move maturity from Apr 2027 to Apr 2029, and reclassify its largest investor, a wealth-management feeder. You work at Calloway Trust Bank (hypothetical), which has been invited to provide the extra $50.0M. The request and the investor roster are hypothetical; the investor totals, the facility and the fund's financials are real.
| Dec-25 | Mar-26 | Jun-26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital commitments | 441.6 | 574.6 | 576.0 |
| Undrawn commitments | 321.6 | 334.9 | 297.4 |
| Share of commitments funded (%) | 27.2 | 41.7 | 48.4 |
| Portfolio investments at fair value | 340.9 | 381.9 | 463.0 |
| Net assets | 118.7 | 244.0 | 279.5 |
| Subscription line Maximum Commitment | 250 | 200 | 200 |
| Subscription line drawn | 223.8 | 88.1 | 105.2 |
| Subscription line available | 26.2 | 84.5 | 15.0 |
| Asset-based facility drawn | 0 | 105 | 130 |
| Asset coverage, as reported (x) | 1.53 | 2.26 | 2.19 |
| Total investment income, quarter | n/a | 8.6 | 10.3 |
| Net investment income, quarter | n/a | 3.9 | 4.0 |
Your call (approve, approve with conditions, or decline), the size and type of loan, and the two or three reasons that decide it.
What the company does and why its cash flow holds up, then the two or three risks that drive the outcome, ranked, each with evidence from the packet.
Pro forma leverage, coverage and free cash flow with the inputs shown, the trend behind them, and what they mean for the lender.
One plausible stress anchored in the company's history or a named shock, carried through to leverage, coverage, liquidity and covenant headroom.
Whether the terms protect the lender against your downside, pricing against the risk, and the changes you would ask for.
The conditions your approval depends on and what would change your mind.
Saved in this browser as you type.