User guides
Six dimensions, 100 points, every score backed by a sentence from your memo, and totals calculated in code.
5 min read · Last updated Oct 6, 2026 · Educational only, not investment advice
When you submit a memo, an AI grader reads it alongside the case packet and scores it against a fixed 100-point rubric. Each of the six scores comes with a short comment and a sentence quoted from your memo as evidence. You also get the three fixes that would improve your memo most, and six follow-up questions for the IC grill.
The grader judges your memo against the case. It doesn't compare you with other users.
| Dimension | Points | Top band rewards |
|---|---|---|
| Investment thesis | 15 | A clear approve or decline recommendation in the first paragraph, backed by two or three specific reasons. |
| Business risk | 15 | The two or three risks that actually drive credit outcomes, such as cyclicality, input costs, customer concentration or competitive position, with evidence from the case. |
| Financial analysis | 20 | Correct leverage, interest coverage, free cash flow and liquidity math, trends over time, and numbers that reconcile to the case. |
| Downside case | 20 | A realistic stress grounded in the company's own history, with the resulting leverage, coverage, covenant headroom and a recovery view. |
| Structure and covenants | 15 | A judgment on whether the covenants and terms actually protect the lender, a view on pricing against risk, and changes where needed. |
| Communication | 15 | Concise and IC-ready, with numbers behind every claim and no filler. |
Each dimension has three bands. Roughly: the top band means an IC would accept that part of the memo as written; the middle band means it's there but generic, unranked, too mild or not quantified; the bottom band means it's missing or wrong.
Every dimension shows one sentence from your memo as evidence. Before you see it, we check that the quote really appears in your memo text (ignoring differences in spacing, quote marks and capitalisation). A quote also has to be substantial: at least six words or 30 characters.
If a quote fails either check, the card shows "Not found in memo" instead. That usually means your memo didn't have a sentence that clearly addressed that dimension, which is useful feedback in itself.
PDF memos
When you upload your memo as a PDF, the grader reads the PDF directly and we can't extract its text to check quotes. For the strictest checking, paste your memo or upload it as a Word file.
Every case has a difficulty level, shown on the case page with a short note on what an IC expects at that level. The grader applies those expectations when it chooses a band, and your scorecard says which level you were graded at.
| Level | What the top band asks for, on top of the level before |
|---|---|
| Foundational | A clear recommendation, leverage, coverage and free cash flow calculated correctly, the main risks named, and a downside that moves EBITDA. |
| Intermediate | A downside grounded in the company's own history, covenant headroom quantified against it, and a view on whether the terms protect the lender. |
| Advanced | LTM and pro forma metrics kept separate, liquidity run through the downside, a recovery view for this facility given where it ranks, documentation leakage named, and pricing judged against the borrower's alternatives. |
The verdict thresholds don't change with the level.
Alongside the six scores you get four checks, each marked met, partly met or missed: correctness (your numbers tie to the case), answers the assignment (you answered the case's questions and the actual loan request), depth (you went beyond restating the packet) and polish (the memo is IC-ready). Checks don't add or remove points.
Under the top fixes, Where you went wrong names up to three root causes: the underlying analytical error behind a weak section, such as stressing revenue while holding margins flat, or using last year's coverage for a new capital structure. Fix the root cause and the symptoms usually go with it.
The grader assigns the six scores. The total and the verdict are calculated in code, so the same scores always produce the same result:
| Total | Verdict |
|---|---|
| 80 or above | IC-ready |
| 60 to 79 | Close, not IC-ready |
| Below 60 | Needs major work |
You can attach up to three supporting files, such as your model or deck: .xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .pptx, .docx or .pdf, up to 10 MB each. The grader may use them to understand your numbers, but it grades and quotes only the memo. A great model attached to a thin memo still gets a thin-memo score.
Scores are generated by AI and can be wrong. Use them as a sparring partner, not a verdict on your career.
Educational only. Nothing in this guide is investment, legal or tax advice. Practice on a case, and never use an employer's confidential documents.