How-to guides
One message per slide, written as a sentence, in the order a committee expects to hear the story.
3 min read · Last updated Oct 6, 2026 · Educational only, not investment advice
The memo is read. The deck is presented, usually with someone interrupting. A good deck lets the committee follow your argument even when you get pulled off course, because each slide makes one point and the slides build in a clear order.
The deck and the memo must agree. Same recommendation, same numbers, same conditions. A mismatch is the fastest way to lose a committee's trust.
Every slide title should be a full sentence that states the takeaway. If someone reads only the titles, they should get the whole argument.
| Weak title | Action title |
|---|---|
| Financial summary | Margins have recovered and free cash flow now covers interest more than twice |
| Downside case | A repeat of the worst historical year breaches the leverage covenant in year two |
| Covenants | Tightening one basket closes the main path for value to leave the credit |
The skim test
Read only your slide titles, in order. If they don't tell a complete story ending in your recommendation, fix the titles before you touch the charts.
Credit committees like tables more than you might expect. A clean table of leverage, coverage and free cash flow by year, base and downside side by side, often does more work than any chart.
The case page's IC deck template follows this order, with space for an action title on every slide and the case historicals and term sheet already in place.
The committee will push on your weakest slide. Before you present, write down the three questions you'd least like to be asked and prepare an answer with a number in it. Then practice answering them out loud.
The IC grill is built for exactly this: six follow-ups aimed at the weakest parts of your memo.
Educational only. Nothing in this guide is investment, legal or tax advice. Practice on a case, and never use an employer's confidential documents.