Key takeaways
- The core shift is from distribute to hold: the question changes from 'will the market take this risk?' to 'will we be repaid?'
- Modeling, documentation exposure and sector knowledge transfer directly. Downside underwriting, monitoring and workouts are what you'll need to show you can learn.
- Frame every deal on your sheet around the credit question and your judgment, not the fees or the league table.
Hold, not distribute
In investment banking and leveraged finance, much of the work is arranging financing and placing it with investors. Banks may keep part of what they arrange, but success is often measured by whether a deal closes and sells. In private credit, the lender usually keeps the loan until it is repaid. That single difference changes what good work looks like.
When you will hold a loan for years, the questions shift. Not 'will investors buy this at this price?' but 'what would have to happen for us not to be repaid, how likely is it, and what in the documents protects us if it does?'
“In syndication, the question is whether the market will take the risk. In private credit, the question is whether you will.”
What transfers
- Modeling. Three-statement models, debt schedules and returns analysis are the same tools; private credit uses them to test repayment rather than to market a deal.
- Documents. If you have worked on term sheets, commitment letters or credit agreements, you already know the vocabulary of covenants, baskets and security.
- Sector knowledge. A view on how an industry makes and loses money is valuable on both sides of the table.
- Working with sponsors and management. Private credit lenders talk to the same people you did; the conversations are just longer-lived.
What's new
- Underwriting the downside. A credit memo lives or dies on a specific, plausible stress case carried all the way to covenants and liquidity.
- Documents as protection. Terms are not just negotiated; they are what you rely on in a bad year. Every covenant has to bite before you are impaired.
- Monitoring. After closing comes years of quarterly reporting, covenant tests and conversations about performance.
- Amendments and workouts. When a borrower needs a change, you are the counterparty deciding what to ask for in return.
What the first year looks like
Expect your time to split between new deals and the existing portfolio. On new deals you will build the model, draft parts of the memo and sit in on diligence calls. On the portfolio you will read quarterly reporting, check covenant compliance, update the model when results come in and flag anything that looks off.
The portfolio work is where the job differs most from banking. A loan you helped approve stays on your desk, and its performance is a running report card on the underwriting. Analysts who learn quickly are the ones who go back to the original memo when a borrower misses its plan and ask which assumption failed and whether the documents gave the lender the protection it expected.
Telling your story
Interviewers want to see that you think like a lender. For each deal on your sheet, prepare three sentences: what the credit question was, what you did on it, and what you would underwrite differently if you were the one holding the loan. Talk about risks and protections rather than fees or rankings.
| Banker framing | Lender framing |
|---|---|
| Led the model for a sponsor-backed refinancing | Built the downside case: a margin squeeze like the company's worst year, carried to covenant headroom |
| Helped market the loan to institutional investors | Identified the two terms investors pushed back on and why they mattered for recovery |
| Coordinated diligence workstreams | Flagged customer concentration as the risk that decided the leverage |
Illustrative example of wording, not a real deal.
Prepare for the case study
Most private credit processes include a case study: a packet of financials and a term sheet, a few hours or days, and a memo or model at the end, followed by questions from the people who would sit on your committee. The best preparation is repetition: write memos on real-looking deals, get honest feedback, and practise defending the numbers out loud.
Start with a Foundational case, then move to sponsor buyouts and asset-based deals. Use the interview prep tool to build answers to the fit and technical questions you are likely to face.
Keep going
- Case: Copperline HVAC Services: a $150M buyout loan and a $40M add-on facilityMembers · Foundational · Direct lending
- Case: Brennan Family Foods: a family bakery, a bank exit and a 26% customer out to bidMembers · Foundational · Direct lending
- Guide: How to write an IC memoMembers
- Guide: Private credit and direct lendingMembers
- Interview prepMembers
- Private Credit 20 learning pathMembers
Educational content; not investment advice. Figures in exhibits are illustrative unless a source is given.