Ridgeline Crossing Partners is a special-purpose project company formed to replace the 1960s-era Ridgeline River bridge, a 1.2-mile, four-lane interstate crossing that a state department of transportation (the State, rated AA−) has classified as structurally deficient. Under a 35-year design-build-finance-operate-maintain concession, the project company builds the new bridge over about three years, then operates and maintains it for 32 years and hands it back in specified condition. There are no tolls: the State pays an annual availability payment if the bridge is open and meets performance standards.
The maximum availability payment is $88.0M in the first operating year, with 60% of it indexed to inflation (assumed 2.0% a year) and 40% fixed. The State deducts from the payment for lane closures and missed performance standards; deductions can reach 100% of the payment. Payments are subject to annual appropriation by the state legislature, with a non-appropriation termination right that requires the State to compensate senior debt in full.
Construction is subcontracted to the Arcadia–Harlow joint venture under a fixed-price, date-certain design-build contract of $860M. Operations and maintenance are subcontracted to an affiliate of one of the equity sponsors. The project company is asking for $780M of senior secured, fixed-rate debt with a 28-year amortization after completion, sculpted to a 1.30x minimum debt service coverage ratio in the sponsor's base case.
The IC question: with no traffic risk, does the package of contractor security, reserves and covenants protect the lender through construction, lifecycle spikes and a period of poor performance, and is 135 bp over Treasuries enough?
| Op year 1 (2030) | Op year 5 | Op year 10 | Op year 20 | Op year 30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Availability payment, before deductions | 88.0 | 92.4 | 98.3 | 112.1 | 129.0 |
| Operations and maintenance | 9.0 | 9.9 | 11.2 | 14.4 | 18.4 |
| Insurance and project company costs | 3.0 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 6.1 |
| Lifecycle reserve contributions | 4 | 5 | 12 | 14 | 6 |
| Cash flow available for debt service | 72.0 | 74.1 | 71.3 | 78.9 | 98.4 |
| Senior debt service | 52.0 | 53.5 | 54.0 | 56.0 | 0.0 |
| DSCR (sponsor base case) | 1.38x | 1.39x | 1.32x | 1.41x | n/a (debt repaid) |
Your call (approve, approve with conditions, or decline), the size and type of loan, and the two or three reasons that decide it.
What the company does and why its cash flow holds up, then the two or three risks that drive the outcome, ranked, each with evidence from the packet.
Pro forma leverage, coverage and free cash flow with the inputs shown, the trend behind them, and what they mean for the lender.
One plausible stress anchored in the company's history or a named shock, carried through to leverage, coverage, liquidity and covenant headroom.
Whether the terms protect the lender against your downside, pricing against the risk, and the changes you would ask for.
The conditions your approval depends on and what would change your mind.
Saved in this browser as you type.